No adaptation of King’s is more well known than The Shining (1980). No other adaptation of any author is more famous for being so unfaithful to the source material either. However, it remains to be one of, if not the most well-regarded adaptation of Stephen King’s work. How is this possible?
The Shining (1980) is full of stunning visuals and incredible tension. Jack Nicholson and Shelley Duval are still highly praised for their performances to this day. However, according to IMDB, Stephen King thought that the film was all visuals without the underlying material, so far as calling it “a fancy car without an engine”. This is where I think that the ‘emphasis’ factor comes into play. Stanley Kubrick saw something in King’s novel that he ultimately wanted to bring to the screen more than anything else. Kubrick is famous for doing films ‘his way’ and for following his own vision no matter what. King and Kubrick have very different styles, and when a very prominent director takes over the work of one of America’s most prolific authors, there may be some differences.
The Shining (1980) is directed by Stanley Kubrick and stars Jack Nicholson and Shelley Duval. The film centers around Jack (Nicholson) and Wendy Torrance (Duval), a young couple with a five year-old son named Danny. Jack is a recovering alcoholic who has recently been fired from his job. Jack finds work as the winter caretaker for the Overlook Hotel in the Rocky Mountains. The hotel has a colorful history and is the home to many restless spirits. Danny notices these spirits using something called “the shine”, telepathic abilities that give him visions of the future. The angry spirits start to haunt Jack, unhinging his mind and making him increasingly dangerous.
After reading the novel, watch the film. Note the differences. Analyze both and look for creative differences between Kubrick and King. After watching the film, answer the following questions:
What were the overall themes of the novel?
- What did Kubrick decide to emphasize from the novel?
- How did Kubrick emphasize what he took from the novel? What techniques did he use? Were they effective?
- Did any of the differences in the film make the story stronger? Weaker? Explain.
- What was the biggest difference between the novel and film in your opinion?
- What about the overall feel of Kubrick’s vision was different than King’s material
- Did Jack Nicholson and Shelley Duval bring anything different to the roles of Jack and Wendy that worked better for the characters?
- Did the simpler narrative serve the plot of the film better or worse than the novel?
- Which did you enjoy the most?
- Which did you think was better at communicating horror?